State of bombay vs hospital mazdoor sabha

Author: qlgx

August undefined, 2024

WebIn State of Bombay vs. Hospital Masdoor Sabha [3] Þ An industrial undertaking was held to imply any ‘systematic activity’ undertaken for production or distribution of goods or services ‘to the community at large’ with the help of employees. Hence, hospitals were held to come under the definition of industry. Web: This is an appeal by the State of Bombay (hereinafter called the appellant) and two others and it arises from a writ petition filed against it by the Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, a trade …

BOMBAY UNION OF JOURNALISTS Vs. STATE OF BOMBAY

WebState of Bombay and Others v/s Hospital Mazdoor Sabha and Others Civil Appeal No. 712 of 1957 Decided On, 29 January 1960 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE P. B. … WebHospital Mazdoor Sabha, ...185) The dissenting opinion is on the lines of the opinion of Gajendragadkar, J. in the case of State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha where it was observed that...terms in which the definition is couched and applying the doctrine of noscitur a sociis (which, as pointed out by this Court in State of Bombay v ... 38式野炮

The Hospital Mazdoor Sabha v. The State Of Bombay Bombay …

WebMay 5, 2005 · The dissenting opinion is on the lines of the opinion of Gajendragadkar J. in the case of State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR (1960) SC 866 where it was observed that although the definition in the Act is very wide, ‘a line has to be drawn in a fair and just manner’ to exclude some callings of services or undertakings which do ... WebState of Bombay Vs. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR 1960 SC 610 : (1960)1 LLJ 251 [Para 8] State of Karnataka Vs. Ameerbi, 2006(13) Scale 319 [Para 9] JUDGMENT. A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. :- Heard. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned Counsel for the rival parties. 2. In the present petition, the petitioner is seeking ... State Of Bombay V. The Hospital Mazdoor Sabha: Case Analysis By KINJAL GUPTA / 28 June 2024 Conflicts between the management of any industry and the workers unions have been taking place for a very long time now. To combat such disputes, the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was enacted. See more The defendants; Ms. Vatsala Narayan and Mrs. Ruth Isaac were employed in the services of JJ. Hospitals as ward servants, one of the five hospitals owned and looked after by the Appellant; … See more Section 2(j): Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines ‘industry’ as any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture, or calling of employers and includes any calling, … See more 38悪性腫瘍

State Of Bombay V. The Hospital Mazdoor Sabha: Case …

Revising the Supreme Court’s attempt to revise the triple test ...

WebJul 15, 2011 · In brief: • There is no difference between Mumbai and Bombay as these are names of the same city that is the capital of the state of Maharashtra. • Bombay is the … Web1 day ago · A group named "Hactivist Indonesia" has claimed to have issued a list of 12,000 Indian government websites, including Central and States, which it may attack in the coming days, an alert circulated by the Ministry of Home Affairs' Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C) points. 38所985学校有哪些WebIn the case of State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha(1960-I-LLJ-251) even a hospital run by the Government without profit motive was held to be an 'industry'. A discordant note was however struck in the case of Safdar Jung Hospital v. 38式騎兵銃

"Webapplied the test laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha to consider how far the activities of Madras Pinjarapole fulfilled the two essential requirements to constitute an industry, namely : (1) The co-operation of the employer and the employees ; and (2) The satisfaction of human wants and desires. " - State of bombay vs hospital mazdoor sabha

State of bombay vs hospital mazdoor sabha

TRIPLE TEST – MODE TO DETERMINE AN INDUSTRY - Jus Corpus

Weblaid down by Hidayatullah, J. in Hospital Mazdoor Sabha with the following parameters – (a) it involves co-operation between employer and employee, (b) its object is the satisfaction … Webbombay union of journalists vs. state of bombay - supreme court of india (from: bombay) - december 19, 1963 ... state of bombay vs. hospital mazdoor sabha [referred to] ... hospital employees union vs. secretary labour government of nct of delhi [laws(dlh)-2002-5-20] ...

Did you know?

Web4 hours ago · Thirteen persons, including at least five minors, were killed and 29 others injured after a bus carrying young male and female members of a traditional music troupe fell into a gorge on the old Mumbai-Pune highway in Raigad district of Maharashtra early on Saturday, police said. The private bus with 42 persons on board was going from Pune to … WebMar 10, 2024 · In State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR 1960 SC 610 case, the Supreme Court held that the activity by the institution must involve the habitual or …

WebAgainst the order of the District Court a revision petition was presented to the High Court under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. Malimath, J., after considering the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, and also the subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court in Management of Safder Jung Hospital v. Web1State of Bombay Vs Hospital Mazdoor Sabha 2University of Delhi Vs Ramnath 3Management of Safdurjung Hospital, Delhi Vs Kuldip Singh 4Bangalore Water Supply Vs A. Rayappa View Answer Answer: Bangalore Water Supply Vs A. Rayappa 7Which of the following statements are correct ? The ‘Basic Structure’ of the Constitution of India cannot …

WebDec 26, 2024 · Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, [1960] I LLJ 251. 3. Madras Gymkhana Club Employees' Union v. ... can be found in a 2024 order passed by a seven-judges ' bench in State ofUttar Pradesh v. WebPRAGYA’S & KARTIKEYA’S CASE ANALYSIS. State of Bombay V. The Hospital Mazdoor Sabha Citation:- 1960 AIR 610, 1960 SCR (2) 866. 1 PRAGYA’S & KARTIKEYA’S CASE ANALYSIS. Factual Matrix of the case 1. The defendants; Ms. Vatsala Narayan and Mrs. Ruth Isaac were employed in the services of JJ.

Web1 hour ago · IIT Bombay suicide case created a stir among the students and protests are being held demanding justice for Darshan Solanki who died by jumping off the seventh floor of a hostel building inside the campus ... As per the data shared by the Union Government in Rajya Sabha, Sixty one students of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), National ...

WebThe Hospital Mazdoor Sabha v. The State Of Bombay. Chagla, C.J:— The petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 were employed in the J.J Group of Hospitals as Ward-servants and their services … 38所所长陈信平去哪里了WebThe defendants; Ms. Vatsala Narayan and Mrs. Ruth Isaac were employed in the services of JJ. Hospitals as ward servants, one of the five hospitals owned and looked after by the Appellant; State of Bombay. 2. Their services were terminated in 1954. A notice was served to both the petitioners regarding their termination. 38所在哪 38所招聘官网WebHospital Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1960 SC 610 where this Court sought to expand the concept of “industry” by a process of judicial interpretation to meet the changing requirements of … 38手举牌WebOct 23, 2024 · 5 State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1960 SC 610. 6 Lalit Hari Ayurvedic College Pharmacy v. Workers Union AIR 1960 SC 1261. 7 Bombay Panjrapole v. Workmen (1971) 3 SCC 349. 8 Union of India v. Labour Court, (1984) 2 LLN 577 ). 9 State of Punjab v. Kuldip Singh and another, 1983 Lab IC 83). 38才出産WebJan 29, 2024 · One of the pivotal cases that had discussed this rule in detail is that of State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha [9], way back in 1960 in the judgement authored by Justice Gajendragadkar. Although the application of the rule had been rejected in the case by the SC, the scope of the rule had been analysed. 38才女優WebHe urged that, the four adjectives have been used disjunctively and each must be given its own separate meaning and pointed out that in two decisions, namely, State of Bombay v. The Hospital Mazdoor Sabha and the Corporation of the City of Nagpur v. 38所985大学最新排名